Headless Data Architecture
In the context of modern data engineering, Headless Data Architecture is a design pattern that separates the data storage and management layer (the "body") from the processing and analysis tools (the "heads").
It applies the "headless" concept—popularized in CMS and commerce—to data: store your data once in an open, neutral format, and bring any engine you want to query it.
Here is the breakdown of how it works, its components, and why it is gaining traction.
The Core Concept: Decoupling
In a traditional "monolithic" data warehouse (like older implementations of Oracle or Teradata, or even tightly coupled cloud warehouses), the storage, the compute engine, and the catalog are bundled together. If you want to use that data, you must use that specific vendor's engine.
Headless Data Architecture decouples these three layers:
Storage: Where data lives (e.g., S3, ADLS).
Table Format: How data is organized (e.g., Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake).
Compute (The "Heads"): The engines that process data (e.g., Spark, Trino, DuckDB, Flink).
Key Components
A. The Storage Layer (The Body)
Instead of loading data into a proprietary database file format, you store it in cheap, scalable object storage (like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage).
B. The Open Table Format
This is the "glue" that makes headless architecture possible. Formats like Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake, or Apache Hudi allow you to treat files in object storage as if they were SQL tables. They handle metadata, transactions (ACID), and schema evolution without needing a running database server.
C. The Catalog
Because there is no central database "server" running 24/7, you need a Catalog (like AWS Glue, REST Catalog, or Unity Catalog) to tell the different engines where the tables are and what their schema looks like.
D. The "Heads" (Bring Your Own Compute)
This is the defining feature. Because the data is in an open format (like Iceberg), you can plug different engines into the same data simultaneously:
Apache Flink: For real-time streaming ingestion into the table.
Spark: For heavy batch processing and machine learning models reading that same table.
Trino / Starburst: For fast, interactive SQL queries by analysts.
DuckDB: For local, single-node analysis.
Comparison: Traditional vs. Headless
Feature
Traditional Data Warehouse
Headless Data Architecture
Storage Format
Proprietary (e.g., Snowflake micro-partitions, Redshift blocks)
Open (Parquet, Avro) wrapped in Table Formats (Iceberg)
Compute Engine
Coupled (Must use vendor's engine)
Decoupled (Use Spark, Trino, Flink, etc.)
Vendor Lock-in
High (Hard to migrate data out)
Low (Data is yours; swap engines easily)
Cost
Storage & Compute often bundled or marked up
Pay specifically for the storage and compute you use
Access
Via JDBC/ODBC through the warehouse
Direct access via file APIs or any compatible engine
"Headless BI" (A Related Concept)
You may also hear "Headless" in the context of Business Intelligence (Headless BI). This is a layer above the data architecture described above.
Headless BI (or a Semantic Layer) creates a centralized definition of metrics (e.g., "What is Revenue?") that separates the business logic from the visualization tool.
Goal: Instead of defining "Revenue" separately in Tableau, PowerBI, and Excel (leading to different numbers), you define it once in the Semantic Layer (like Cube, LookML, or dbt MetricFlow). All tools then query this "Headless" layer to get the consistent metric.
Why Adopt Headless Data Architecture?
Future-Proofing: You aren't betting your entire company's data strategy on a single vendor's roadmap. If a faster query engine comes out next year, you can just plug it into your existing data.
Cost Efficiency: You can use a cheap engine for ETL (like Spark on spot instances) and an expensive, fast engine (like Snowflake or Starburst) only for high-priority analyst queries.
Unified Batch & Streaming: Open table formats allow streaming tools (Kafka/Flink) to write data that is immediately available for batch readers (Spark/Trino).
Summary
Headless Data Architecture is about owning your storage. By keeping your data in open formats, you turn the database engine into a commodity that can be swapped, mixed, or matched depending on the specific workload (streaming vs. batch vs. interactive) without ever moving the data itself.
Last updated