Microservices fundamentals
Microservices architecture is an approach to system design in which a large application is constructed as a suite of small, independently deployable services, each responsible for a specific, well-bounded capability. Each service owns its data and logic, communicates with others through well-defined interfaces (usually APIs or event streams), and can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently.
What Microservices Are
A microservice is a self-contained unit that encapsulates:
A narrowly scoped business capability (e.g., “Payments”, “User Profile”, “Recommendation Engine”).
Its own data storage (databases or state store).
Its own deployment lifecycle.
A clear contract for communication (REST/gRPC APIs, message queues, event logs).
The overarching system becomes a composition of these autonomous units rather than one large, interconnected codebase.
Why Microservices Are Important (General Perspective)
A. Independent Deployment and Faster Delivery
Each service can be modified and released without redeploying the entire system. This enables teams to ship features and fixes rapidly and with reduced risk.
B. Scalability at the Right Granularity
Different parts of a system have different performance profiles. Microservices allow targeted scaling:
A “Search” service may require heavy CPU/compute.
A “Checkout” service may demand high availability.
A “Reporting” service may require heavy I/O throughput.
You scale only what you need, lowering operational cost.
C. Technological Freedom (Polyglot Architecture)
Teams can choose the most appropriate programming languages, frameworks, storage engines, or protocols for each service. This avoids the long-term stagnation associated with monolithic codebases.
D. Failure Isolation and Improved Resilience
If one service fails, it need not bring down the entire system. Techniques such as circuit breakers, retries, idempotent operations, and bulkheads significantly enhance system robustness.
E. Organizational Alignment
Microservices align well with product-oriented team structures. Small autonomous teams can own entire services end-to-end (design → build → operate). This avoids cross-team entanglement, accelerates development, and supports organizational scaling.
What Problems Microservices Solve (General)
They are most helpful when addressing:
Monolith fragility: small change causes unpredictable system-wide failures.
Monolith complexity: codebase becomes too large and interdependent to maintain easily.
Slow deployments: every update requires redeploying the entire application.
Scaling constraints: the system can scale only as a whole, not in parts.
Team bottlenecks: too many developers touching the same repository cause reduced velocity.
Why Microservices Matter in Data Engineering
Data platforms increasingly resemble complex ecosystems of ingestion, processing, storage, governance, and serving layers. Microservices integrate naturally into this landscape.
A. Decoupled Data Pipelines
In traditional monolithic ETL systems, a single failure or schema change can break the entire pipeline. Microservices allow pipeline stages to be modular, versioned, and independently deployed.
Examples:
Ingestion services for different domains (ERP, CRM, IoT).
Transformation services for various business entities.
Serving layers (feature stores, APIs, dashboards, ML inference).
Each service evolves independently.
B. Domain-Oriented Data Architecture (Aligned with Data Mesh)
Microservices align closely with data mesh principles:
Domain ownership
Decentralized governance
Data-as-a-product
Each data domain can expose data products through APIs or event streams, allowing the organization to scale data practices across multiple teams.
C. Real-Time Processing and Event-Driven Ecosystems
Modern data engineering relies heavily on streams (Kafka, Pulsar, Kinesis). Microservices integrate naturally into event-driven topologies:
Services publish domain events (e.g., “OrderCreated”).
Downstream services consume, enrich, aggregate, or serve that data.
Processing becomes more resilient and more scalable.
D. Independent Data Storage and Fit-for-Purpose Persistence
Different data modalities require different storage engines:
OLTP for transactional services
OLAP for analytical services
Document stores for semi-structured data
Time-series databases for metrics
Object stores for lakehouse architectures
Microservices enable you to assign the optimal storage to each domain without enforcing a single database for the entire platform.
E. Operational Separation and Easier SLA Management
Data engineering pipelines often serve different consumers with different SLAs:
Real-time fraud detection requires sub-second latency.
Daily batch aggregations tolerate longer windows.
ML feature computation may require high throughput.
Microservices let you isolate workloads and assign specific resources, SLOs, and operational strategies per service.
F. Enhanced Observability and Governance
A microservices architecture encourages:
Tracing and lineage
Per-service health metrics
Schema versioning
Strict API/contract boundaries
Error isolation
This improves reliability and maintainability of complex data platforms.
🔑 Technical Fundamentals of Microservices
Service Boundaries (Domain-Driven Design)
Microservices map to bounded contexts—clean separation around business capabilities.
Communication Patterns
Two main methods:
Synchronous
REST
gRPC
Pros: simple Cons: creates tight coupling, cascading failures
Asynchronous
Kafka / Pulsar / RabbitMQ
Event sourcing
Change Data Capture (CDC)
Pros: resilience, scalability Cons: complexity in event modeling
Data Isolation
Each microservice owns its data.
No shared database. This enforces:
autonomy
independent scaling
schema evolution
better cache locality
Tech patterns:
data duplication
event sourcing
CQRS
Observability
Distributed systems require:
structured logs
metrics
tracing (OpenTelemetry)
health checks
dashboards
Without this, debugging becomes impossible.
Resilience Patterns
To handle failure gracefully:
Retry/backoff strategies
Circuit breakers
Bulkheads
Timeouts
Dead-letter queues (for events)
Distributed State Management
Since microservices do not share memory, state coordination requires patterns:
Sagas
Orchestration (e.g., Temporal, Airflow)
Choreography via events
Deployment Fundamentals
Microservices work best with:
Containers (Docker)
Container orchestration (Kubernetes)
Service mesh (Istio, Linkerd)
API gateway (Kong, Ambassador, NGINX, AWS API Gateway)
Versioning & Backward Compatibility
Services evolve independently, so:
contract versioning
schema evolution for events
backward-compatible API changes
blue/green deployments
feature flags
are essential.
❗ Downsides of Microservices (And Why People Complain)
Microservices do not come for free. They introduce complexity that small teams or simple products do NOT need.
1. Massive operational overhead
You must manage:
dozens or hundreds of services
logs, metrics, traces for each
deployments for each
environments for each
A monolith has one deployable, microservices may have 50+.
2. Higher cognitive load
A developer must understand:
network communication
async failures
distributed tracing
eventual consistency
service health patterns
Monoliths are much simpler.
3. Debugging across services is painful
Problems often combine:
service A sends malformed payload to service B
service B reads stale cache
service C times out
You need distributed tracing workflows.
4. Data consistency becomes hard
In a monolith → ACID transactions across modules. In microservices → you get eventual consistency by necessity.
You must handle:
out-of-order events
retries
idempotency
duplicate messages
Hard problems.
5. Network flakiness becomes your problem
The network is unreliable; retries → cascading failures; cascading failures → thundering herd; thundering herd → meltdown.
6. More expensive infrastructure
Running 40 services instead of 1 = more CPU, more memory, more Kubernetes nodes, more ops cost.
7. Microservices are easy to overuse
Startups commonly break their small app into 20 microservices prematurely. This leads to:
slower development
higher incident rate
more DevOps work
no real performance gain
Last updated