Backfilling
In data engineering, backfilling is the process of running a data pipeline on historical data that was either missed, corrupted, or did not exist when the pipeline was first deployed.
Think of it as "rewriting history" for your data warehouse. While standard pipelines process data as it arrives (incrementally), a backfill looks backward to ensure the entire timeline is consistent and accurate.
Why Backfilling is Necessary
There are three primary scenarios that trigger a backfill:
Pipeline Failure: A bug or upstream outage caused data gaps for a specific period.
Logic Changes: You updated a transformation (e.g., a new way to calculate "Active Users") and need to apply this logic to the last two years of data.
New Requirements: You added a new column or table and need to populate it with historical records to support trend analysis.
The Mechanics: Idempotency
The most critical concept in backfilling is Idempotency. A pipeline is idempotent if running it multiple times with the same input produces the same output without creating duplicates or side effects.
Non-idempotent: Running a backfill for "January 1st" appends 1,000 rows. Running it again appends another 1,000, resulting in 2,000 rows (duplicates).
Idempotent: Running a backfill for "January 1st" first deletes existing records for that date and then inserts the new ones, ensuring exactly 1,000 rows remain.
Best Practices for Successful Backfilling
1. Use Partitioned Tables
Partitioning your data by date (e.g., YYYY-MM-DD) is the "gold standard." It allows you to drop and replace specific "slices" of data without touching the rest of the dataset. This makes backfills faster and less risky.
2. Atomic Overwrites
Whenever possible, use operations that swap data instantly.
Staging Strategy: Write your backfilled data to a temporary table, verify it, and then use an
ALTER TABLE ... RENAMEor a partition swap to replace the old data. This prevents users from seeing a "half-empty" table while the backfill is running.
3. Manage Upstream/Downstream Dependencies
Backfilling isn't a vacuum. If you backfill a "Core" table, any "Mart" or "Report" tables that rely on it must also be recalculated.
Orchestration: Tools like Airflow or Kestra allow you to trigger "downstream" tasks automatically once a backfill is complete.
4. Implement Throttling and Concurrency Limits
Running a backfill for 5 years of data simultaneously can crash your warehouse or exhaust your API quotas.
Batching: Break the backfill into smaller chunks (e.g., month by month).
Resource Pools: Limit the number of concurrent backfill tasks so they don't starve your production "live" pipelines of resources.
5. Validate Before Swapping
Never assume a backfill worked just because the code finished.
Row Count Checks: Does the backfilled month have roughly the same number of rows as the original?
Null Checks: Ensure the new logic didn't accidentally introduce nulls into primary keys.
Common Pitfalls
Hard-coded Dates: Ensure your SQL queries use dynamic parameters (like
{{ execution_date }}) rather than hard-coded strings.Ignoring Logs: Always keep a log of which dates were backfilled, by whom, and why.
Schema Evolution: If your table schema has changed over time, a backfill logic written for "today" might fail on data from three years ago.
Interdependence vs. Recomputability
A fundamental tension in data architecture is Interdependence vs. Recomputability.
If your data records are tightly coupled—meaning the value of a record today depends heavily on the state of a record from yesterday—backfilling becomes a massive "domino effect" headache.
To manage this, data engineers use specific strategies to minimize how much history they have to rewrite.
State vs. Events (The "Event Sourcing" approach)
The best way to keep records independent is to treat data as a series of immutable events rather than a single changing state.
The Problem (State-based): If you only store a user’s current "Account Balance," and you realize there was a math error two months ago, you have no easy way to fix it without recalculating every single transaction since then.
The Solution (Event-based): You store every individual
depositandwithdrawal. To backfill, you simply update the faulty transaction event. Because the "Balance" is just a sum of these independent events, the history remains audit-able and easier to fix.
Handling Sequential Logic
Sometimes, records must be dependent (e.g., Sessionization, where you need to know when the last click happened to define a "session"). In these cases, we use Window Functions or Stateful Processing.
The Trap: If you calculate a "Running Total" and store it in a row, changing one row 100 days ago invalidates the next 100 rows.
The Fix: We often avoid storing the "Running Total" in the base layer. Instead, we store the raw independent records and calculate the total "on the fly" or in a downstream Materialized View. This way, a backfill only touches the specific records that changed.
The "Checkpoint" Strategy
If you absolutely must have dependencies (like in a complex financial ledger), you use Checkpoints or Snapshots.
Instead of recalculating from the "beginning of time," you save the state of the world at regular intervals (e.g., the last day of every month).
If you need to backfill data for March, you only need to start from the February 28th snapshot and process forward, rather than starting from three years ago.
Summary of Record Independence
Strategy
How it helps Backfilling
Immutability
Records are never changed, only added. You just "insert" the fix.
Statelessness
Records don't look at "previous" rows; they contain all info needed.
Late Arrival Handling
Using updated_at timestamps allows you to backfill specific "windows" of time.
The Golden Rule: If you find yourself having to backfill your entire 5-year history because of a small change last week, your data model is likely too stateful (coupled). Aim for stateless transformations where possible.
Last updated